Truncation Trump Donald Trump caused a flow of a lot of ink. Many entities actually pointed to the centralization of the token and the direct involvement of the President of the United States. Now the public non -profit organization citizen filed an official complaint with the Ministry of Justice.
- Trump’s Token by Donald Trump, the opening of Donald Trump, caused an official complaint filed by a citizen by a citizen to the Ministry of Justice.
- A public citizen expressed concern about the request for gifts and potential violations of the clause of the treatments by the Trump token.
Civic Public Substanty Complaint Against Trump
Civic audience It is a non -profit organization that presents itself as a government guard of government, businesses and consumers.
Wednesday 4th February the organization filed a An official complaint with the Ministry of JusticeAs with the Office of Government Ethics.
According to the complaint Donald Trump would violate laws prohibiting donationsPromotion of his Trump Token.
According to a public citizen, Trump ” Seems to be demanding money in exchange for nothing ». It would therefore be the question of “requesting a gift that will benefit him personally”.
“Trump is even the main owner of Trump. The site explains that the same belongs to a large extent (80 %) of CIC Digital LLC, a “subsidiary of Trump”. CIC Digital is 100 % owned by Donald J Trump Revocable Trust. Donald Trump is the “only recipient” cancelable confidence. The question on the web: “Is it the official Trump product?” “The site answers,” Yes, this is the only official Trump, President Donald J. Trump. »»
The same thing that shields an institute
In addition to the laws on gifts, a public citizen also raised constitutional concerns about their ability to mask foreign payments prohibited according to the clause on the enjoyments.
As a reminder, clause Forbidden from federal fees to obtain gifts, payments or benefits from foreign governments without the consent of Congress.
As a result, a public citizen is worried about the use of Trump token to circumvent this clause.
“Given the nature of the cryptocurrency exchange, it is difficult to know whether foreign state players offer the President a gift by buying a MEM Trump. »»
The organization therefore requires investigation and corrective measures to prevent what it considers to be an obvious violation of federal laws and ethical standards.
“Danger associated with Trump’s meme are bad.” If the President was entitled to enrich himself in this way, other politicians could follow this path, which virtually ineffective banned the ban on harassment stipulated in Article 18 of Section 201 and bans on gifts by other employees other than the president.
As a result, we ask the Office of Government Ethics and the Ministry of Justice to explore this organization to determine whether it represents offering unacceptable gifts. If and OGy find a positive answer, we ask them to issue appropriate recommendations, in particular the termination of the MEME sales, the payment of paid amounts and any other available appeal. ”
Trump and his Trump Token in Chaos
Obviously, a public citizen is not the first entity to sound an alarm. Thus, a few days after the start of the token, several groups of monitoring warned the risks associated with this token.
Subsequently, it was the democratic senator Chris van Holen, who asked Dry to explore Trump Token.
Recently, it was a group of naacp civil rights that sounded an alarm. So they said Trump Token was “illegal, dangerous and harmful”.
It seems that Donald Trump is ignoring criticism, which is, as shown in his different shopping crypto, under the name World Liberty Financial, his family cryptometers.